Differences Between Split-Type and All-in-One C-arm Machines: How to Choose the Right One
In modern medical imaging and surgical environments, the C-arm X-ray machine has become an essential piece of equipment in operating rooms. As technology evolves, two main structural types have emerged — split-type C-arms and all-in-one C-arms.
What are the differences between them? And how should medical institutions choose the right type? Let’s explore in detail.
1. Structural Differences
Split-Type C-arm
A split-type C-arm consists of two main components: the C-arm main unit and the workstation. They are connected via cables or a network. During surgery, doctors can operate the main unit for imaging while another person adjusts parameters and views images on the workstation.
This setup offers flexibility in positioning and operation, especially in large operating rooms where multiple medical staff members collaborate.
All-in-One C-arm
The all-in-one C-arm integrates the imaging system, control console, and display screen into a single compact unit. It requires less space, is easy to move, and can often be operated by one person.
This design is ideal for limited-space environments or scenarios that require frequent movement, such as emergency departments, ICUs, and orthopedic wards.
2. Performance and Operation Comparison
| Comparison Item | Split-Type C-arm | All-in-One C-arm |
|---|---|---|
| Operation Mode | Separate control, suitable for multi-person collaboration | Integrated control, easy single-person operation |
| Mobility & Layout | Larger footprint, more cables | Compact, flexible, and easy to position |
| Imaging Performance | Typically equipped with high-end processing systems | Newer models offer comparable image quality |
| Maintenance & Upgrade | Easier to maintain and upgrade individual modules | Requires overall service consideration |
| Recommended Application | Large hospitals, complex surgeries | Small to medium-sized hospitals, outpatient or emergency use |
3. Application Recommendations
- For hospitals prioritizing performance and collaboration:
The split-type C-arm is more suitable for large hospitals or departments such as orthopedics, spine surgery, and pain management — where image precision and workflow flexibility are essential. - For institutions emphasizing mobility and space efficiency:
The all-in-one C-arm is the ideal choice for smaller facilities or departments with limited space. It offers easy operation and convenient mobility, improving overall clinical efficiency.
4. Perlove Medical C-arm Solutions
As a leading manufacturer of digital radiography and fluoroscopy equipment, Perlove Medical provides a full range of C-arm solutions — from compact all-in-one systems to advanced split-type configurations.
- PLX7100 All-in-One C-arm – Compact, flexible, and delivers high-quality imaging; ideal for orthopedics and trauma surgery.
- PLX119C Split-Type C-arm – High power output and dynamic imaging capabilities; suitable for complex surgical navigation and spine procedures.
Whether you prioritize mobility, efficiency, or high-end imaging, Perlove's C-arm series offers reliable imaging support for diverse clinical needs.
Conclusion
There is no absolute “better” choice between split-type and all-in-one C-arm machines — the optimal solution depends on your hospital’s clinical requirements, spatial layout, and budget.
By understanding their structural and functional differences, you can select the model that best fits your workflow and maximizes clinical value.
评论
发表评论